A Molecular Perspective of Clinical Benefit: Why Shouldn’t Luminal a Breast Cancer Patients be Considered in Pathological Complete Response Discussions_Crimson Publishers

A Molecular Perspective of Clinical Benefit: Why Shouldn’t Luminal a Breast Cancer Patients be Considered in Pathological Complete Response Discussions by Kieber Emmons T in Journal of Cancer Research

 

Crimson Publishers_ Novel Approaches in Cancer Study

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with biological subtypes having different prognostic impacts. This facet is particularly evident in Neoadjuvant trials where Pathological Complete Response (pCR) rates vary. Studies have shown that patients who achieve pCR after neoadjuvant treatment have a better long-term outcome. Consequently, increasing the rate of pCR became the end point of neoadjuvant trials with the expectation of translation into improved survival. However, for Luminal A subtype patients this is not the case, as this cohort does not respond to chemotherapy. Here we consider why this might be the case and several approaches that could change the paradigm treating this cohort.

https://crimsonpublishers.com/nacs/fulltext/NACS.000546.php

  For More Articles on Journal of Cancer Research Please click on: https://crimsonpublishers.com/nacs/ 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Recent Advances in the Therapeutic Approaches of Glioblastoma Multiforme_Crimson Publishers

Release of Inorganic Phosphate into the Tumor Environment: Possible Roles of Ecto- Nucleotidases and Ecto-Phosphatases

Release of Inorganic Phosphate into the Tumor Environment: Possible Roles of Ecto- Nucleotidases and Ecto-Phosphatases_Crimson Publishers